Stephen B. Murphy; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Dr. Murphy
emphasizes that no single approach is adequate for all hip problems,
and that combined approaches are often required for complex problems.
He uses the direct lateral approach for most primary total hip replacements
except those with a severe high-riding dysplastic acetabulum due to
risk of injury to the superior gluteal nerve. Like Dr. Chandler, he
uses the direct lateral approach for simple socket revisions. For many
femoral revisions, he uses a vastus slide exposure, which is a direct
lateral exposure connected to a lateral approach to the femur. He feels
that more extensive revisions require a trochanteric slide exposure.
Dr. Murphy's
technique of direct lateral exposure is similar to Dr. Chandler's, as
he trained as Dr. Chandler's fellow. He splits the gluteus medius more
anteriorly than Dr. Chandler does, identifying a Òsoft spotÓ at the
anterior-superior portion of the greater trochanter, underwhich lies
the bursa deep to the medius and superficial to the minimus tendon.
The incision is made just posterior to that spot. The medius is then
split in line with its fibers from there. He doesn't quantify the percentage
of medius split, but the superior portion of the medius remains intact
and the anterior portion of the medius becomes part of the anterior
flap. Rather than splitting the gluteus minimus as is typically done,
he identifies the posterior border of the minimus, just under the piriformis
tendon, and mobilizes the minimus anteriorly off of the capsule until
the midcoronal line of the capsule is exposed. A thin wafer of the anterior
portion of the greater trochanter is then taken. It is about 10 millimeters
thick proximal-laterally and thins out as the cut goes anterior and
distal. The insertion of the gluteus minimus is attached to the wafer
of bone. It is important to make the bone wafer much thinner in elderly
osteoporotic patients as such patients are at greater risk of postoperative
greater trochanteric fracture at the vastus tubercle. The labrum and
osteophytes are excised leaving the capsule intact. The trochanteric
osteotomy is repaired using #5 braided nonresorbable suture through
drill holes in both the femur and trochanteric wafer.
Dennis Burke, MD; Massachusetts General Hospital
Dr. Burke
uses the direct lateral approach for most primary total hip replacements.
Absolute indications are patients with dementia or spasticity, and patients
whose cultural behaviors require kneeling or squatting for prayer or
toiletry. Exceptions are cases with complex deformity to the proximal
femur or acetabulum because he gains a more extensive exposure from
the posterior approach, and cases with a high-riding acetabulum due
to the risk of injury to the superior gluteal nerve and denervation
of the anterior abductors. Dr. Burke also avoids the direct lateral
approach in patients with severe osteoporosis due to the risk of fracture
to the proximal femur after osteotomy.
Dr. Burke
uses a straight incision through skin and the fascia. He splits the
medius with 60% posterior, 40% anterior to maximize the integrity of
the retained continuity between abductors and extensors. He uses a single-plane
ÒguillotineÓ split to divide medius, minimus and capsule at the same
position, facilitating anatomic closure. When the posterior fibers of
gluteus medius are hindering preparation of the femoral canal, he uses
a Òreverse five for fiftyÓ maneuver. This technique involves releasing
the anterior five millimeters of medius from the posterior edge of the
greater trochanter in order to protect the abductors that remain with
the trochanter from damage during preparation of the femoral canal.
Dr. Burke uses an osteotomy of the greater trochanter measuring about
eight millimeters in thickness. In osteoporotic patients he uses a thinner
wafer to avoid the risk of fracture to the proximal femur. An important
feature of his osteotomy is to crack the anterior edge to create a contour
that allows for anatomic reapproximation of the osteotomy. He emphasizes
the importance of bony reattachment for healing of the abductors to
the trochanter and for retention of abductor strength, noting that soft
tissue releases of the abductor mechanism may be associated with higher
rates of Trendelenberg gait. He reapproximates the capsule only when
he feels that the capsular repair is needed to contribute to stability.
He uses three or four 18 gauge stainless steel wires to reattach the
trochanteric wafer, tensioning the wires with an air drill and the ÒmattababyÓ
wire tightener.
Dr. Burke
identifies stability as the major advantage of the direct lateral approach,
with rates of dislocation in the literature consistently less than one
percent. He has patients limit weight bearing for six weeks post-operatively,
and thereafter has no restrictions on activity, sitting, bending, or
leg position.
Thomas Minas, MD; Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Dr. Minas
uses the direct lateral approach for all primary total joint replacements.
For revisions, he feels that knowledge of several approaches is necessary,
and an approach that optimizes exposure for the defect in revision surgery
is best. Dr. Minas does not see the high hip center as a contraindication
to the direct lateral approach, noting that the superior gluteal nerve
can be identified and protected, and that the approach permits an easy
dislocation of the dysplastic hip anteriorly.
Dr. Minas
uses a straight skin incision along the femoral shaft, curving the incision
anteriorly roximally to protect the abductor/vastus sleeve. He curves
the split in the tensor fascia lata posteriorly to assist with proximal
femoral exposure. His split of the abductors is identified by palpation
of the junction between the muscular and tendinous portion of the medius,
leaving the posterior tendinous portion of medius on the greater trochanter,
and elevating the anterior two thirds of medius off the trochanter in
a soft tissue sleeve. Dr. Minas uses blunt dissection to develop a split
in the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus, and then protects the underlying
capsule by packing the interval between abductor and capsule with a
sponge. He emphasizes that he rarely needs to split the abductors more
than two centimeters proximal to the trochanter, and therefore the superior
gluteal nerve is well protected. He then uses electrocautery to elevate
a soft tissue sleeve of abductors and vastus lateralis off the greater
trochanter anteriorly. He continues to protect the underlying capsule
with a sponge in the interval between abductors and capsule, and most
medially between psoas and capsule. He releases the indirect head of
the rectus femoris from the capsule, and then retracts the soft tissue
sleeve using a Bunnell stitch capturing the minimus and medius, a sharp
Homan in the ilium, and two cobra retractors, one under psoas, and one
over the proximal shaft of the femur. Retraction of the soft tissue
sleeve anteriorly exposes the entire anterior and inferior capsule,
which he then excises. Dr. Minas feels that he is able to gain excellent
exposure of the acetabulum through this approach, even for complex acetabular
reconstructions. In closing, he decorticates the anterior portion of
the greater trochanter with a saw, and sutures the abductor sleeve back
on through three drill holes in the trochanter, using number five nonresorbable
braided suture.
Dr. Minas
identifies stability and ease of dislocation with the dysplastic hip
as the major advantages of the direct lateral approach.. Post-operatively
he uses precautions of partial weight bearing and no active abduction
for four weeks. He initiates active abduction exercises at six weeks
after surgery. He reports that limps consistently disappear with exercise.
Harry Rubash, MD; Massachusetts General Hospital
Dr. Rubash
uses the direct lateral approach for all primary and revision total
hip replacement surgeries. He agrees with Dr. Minas that a high hip
center or dysplastic acetabulum is not a contraindication to the direct
lateral approach because the superior gluteal nerve is easily identifiable,
and the abductors may be split beneath it.
Dr. Rubash
curves his skin incision slightly anteriorly at the level of the greater
trochanter to facilitate exposure of the acetabulum, and then may use
a transverse split of the posterior portion of the fascia lata to improve
exposure to the proximal femur. He splits the medius and minimus tendons
in line with the femoral neck, extending the split to the level of the
capsule. He then uses periosteal elevation to create an anterior sleeve
of abductors and capsule, permitting anterior dislocation of the femur.
Dr. Rubash repairs the anterior sleeve to bone with transosseous sutures.
He identifies stability and excellent exposure of the acetabulum and
femur as the major advantages of the direct lateral exposure.