HOJ HOME | Chiefs Reports | Osgood Day | Scientific Articles | Alumni Association |
| |||||||||||
Osteoporosis, a common condition in post-menopausal women, is defined as a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue with a concomitant increase in bone fragility and fracture risk (1). It is recognized that osteoporosis is an important public health problem because of the large size of the affected population and because of the devastating impact of osteoporotic fractures on morbidity and mortality and on social costs. Health care expenditures in the United States attributable to osteoporotic fractures in 1995 were estimated at $13.8 billion (2) In addition to loss of bone mineral density, neuromuscular function and environmental hazards that influence the risk of fall, and the force of impact, as well as bone strength are important factors in determining fracture risk in the elderly (3) . Bone mineral density, geometry of bone, microarchitecture of bone and quality of the bone material are components that determine bone strength. On average, 70 - 80% of the variability in bone strength in vitro is determined by its density (4) . On an individual basis, density alone accounts for 10 90% of the variation in the strength of trabecular bone (5) . Preliminary data have shown that predicting trabecular bone strength can be greatly improved by including architectural parameters in the analysis (6) . Micro-computed tomography
(µCT) is an emerging technique to image and quantify bone in three dimensions.
Early implementations of three-dimensional micro-tomography (7,8) have
focused more on technical and methodological aspects while a more recent
development (9) has emphasized practical aspects of micro-tomographic
imaging. That system is based on a compact fan-beam type of tomograph,
also referred to as desktop µCT, and has been used extensively for different
research projects involving microstructural bone and biomaterials (10)
. Since the introduction of this specific system, now successfully operating
at the Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center, there has been an increasing demand for micro-tomographic systems
and applications throughout the world.
In this article, strategies for new approaches of bone modeling and simulation in the study and treatment of osteoporosis and age-related bone loss are presented. The focus is on the bioengineering and imaging aspects of osteoporosis research. With the introduction of desktop µCT, a new generation of imaging instruments has entered the arena allowing easy and relatively inexpensive access to the three-dimensional microstructure of bone, thereby giving bone researchers a powerful tool for the exploration of age-related bone loss and osteoporosis. THREE-DIMENSIONAL MICROSTRUCTURAL IMAGING Our desktop imaging system (µCT 20, Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) was originally designed (9) for the non-destructive measurement and analysis of unprocessed surgical bone biopsies but can be used equally well for small animal whole bones and porous biomaterials. For each sample measured, a defined number of micro-tomographic slices are acquired depending on the size of the object assessed. Measurements are stored in three-dimensional image arrays. Total examination time ranges from minutes to hours depending on the number of slices acquired. After the measurement, bone tissue is segmented from marrow and solution with the help of a thresholding procedure (10) . For subsequent analysis, typically a volume of interest (VOI) of the originally measured data is selected including binarized bone tissue only. MODELING METHODS Surface Modeling For the visualization
of three-dimensional binary objects, the method described by Lorensen
and Cline (1987) was followed. They developed an algorithm, called marching
cubes (11) , which makes it possible to triangulate the surface of any
given voxel array very quickly. The marching cubes algorithm is directly
applicable to rastered three-dimensional data.
SIMULATION METHODS Non-Destructive Testing of Mechanical Bone Systems using Finite Element Analysis The ultimate goal of any bone measurement in patients is to estimate bone strength. The relationship between structural indices of cancellous bone and the anisotropic mechanical properties is well documented (6,16) . An alternate approach to determine bone strength is to build models of bone using digital imaging and modeling techniques followed by a structural micro-finite element analysis (µCT). These models have shown that predicted tissue stresses and strains in bone specimens can differ considerably from those estimated from apparent level stresses and strains for the material as a continuum (17,18) . However, since the in situ loading conditions for these specimens are not exactly known, these models are not adequate for a realistic determination of stresses and strains in the bone tissue. For this reason, there is a need for full-scale models including the cortical shell and realistic boundary conditions to model the musculoskeletal interface resulting in an improved prediction of individual bone strength. Recently, a large-scale microstructural model of an intact canine proximal femur was presented to determine the tissue loading conditions in trabeculae (19) . The objective of that study was to supply reasonable estimates of these quantities for the canine femur, and to compare predicted tissue stresses on the microstructural level to apparent stresses on the continuum level. A high-resolution computer reconstruction of the femur was made using a µCT scanner. This was converted to a large-scale FE model with 7.6 million elements and 9.1 million nodes. Using an iterative solver (17) , it was possible to solve this large problem in approximately 30 hours CPU time on a Cray C90 supercomputer. From a refined, local analysis in the center of the femoral head it was found that the predicted tissue loads were much higher than those estimated from the appar-ent values. However, for more than 97% of the tissue material, the tissue values were in the range of zero to four times the estimated apparent values. Ulrich et al. (1997) used the same technology to analyze an in vivo microstructural model of the distal radius measured with high-resolution 3D-QCT (20) . This was the first time that tissue-level stresses and strains were estimated in a living human subject. Simulations of Age-Related Bone Loss and Osteoporosis Treatment It is widely assumed that mechanical stresses and strains influence the remodeling process and subsequently, the structure and strength of the bone. The adaptive response of bone loading is generally referred to as Wolff's law (21) after the German anatomist who first called attention to it. Traditionally, animal experiments have been employed to investigate bone response from load alterations or during the progress of age-related bone loss. Since the time scale of the remodeling process is on the order of months or years, com-putational modeling offers a unique approach to study long term processes without the inconveniences of animal experi-mentation. In a recent study, we investigated if changes in trabecular architecture as observed with age-related bone loss and osteoporosis can be predicted from a computer model that simulates bone resorption after hormone depletion over several decades. Our desktop µCT was used to measure two groups of seven trabecular bone specimens from pre- and post-menopausal women, respectively. A novel algorithm was developed to simulate age-related bone loss for the specimens in the first group. The algorithm, referred to as simulated bone atrophy (SIBA), describes an iterative three-dimensional approach and is based directly on cel-lular bone remodeling with an underlying realistic time frame (22) . For our simulations, bone resorption and formation were in balance until the onset of menopause, set to be at the age of 50. After the onset of menopause, an imbalance in the cell activities was modeled resulting in a net bone loss. Using advanced visualization and animation tools as well as quantitative bone morphometry, the changes in bone architecture associated with the bone loss were monitored over an average time of 43 years until the age of 80 (Figure 4). By applying SIBA to the pre-menopausal specimens, it was possible to "age-match" these specimens with those from the post-menopausal group. Additionally, the effects of bisphosphonates on the trabecular architecture were studied in two different treatment reg-mens by adjusting the values for the cellular activity levels. The first regimen consisted of a five-year block treatment beginning at the onset of menopause. The second regimen showed the effects of life-long bisphosphonate treatment at old age (20 years after the onset of menopause). Using quantitative bone morphometry and large-scale finite element analysis, changes in bone architecture and strength were monitored over approx-imately four decades. The results showed that changes in peri-menopause were most dramatic, and in fact, half the bone loss and half the loss in strength as assessed with microstructural finite element analysis occurred during that period (6 years). As a consequence, the five-year treatment block during peri-menopause was found to be most effective in preventing bone loss after menopause and resulted in improved architecture and strength (23) . It was concluded that peri-menopausal shortterm treatment of women at high risk might be a promising alternative to life-long treatment because of its cost effectiveness and the success in our simulations at preventing most of the bone loss and reduction in strength, thereby reducing the risk of fracture.
|
|||||||||||
|
HOJ HOME | Chiefs Reports | Osgood Day | Scientific Articles | Alumni Association |
References | |
1. | J. A. Kanis, Osteoporosis, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, pp. 1-21, 1994. |
2. | N. Fox Ray, J. K. Chan, M. Thammer, and L. J. Melton, "Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation", J. Bone Min. Res. 12, pp. 24-35, 1997. |
3. | W. C. Hayes, S. J. Piazza and P. K. Zysset, "Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography", Radiol Clin North Am 29, pp. 1-18, 1991 |
4. | N. Dalen, L. Hellstrom, and B. Jacobson, "Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck", Acta Orthop. Scand. 47, pp. 503-508, 1976. |
5. | M. J. Ciarelli, S. A. Goldstein, J. L. Kuhn, D. D. Cody, and M. B. Brown, "Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography", J. Orthop. Res. 9, pp. 674-682, 1991 |
6. | C. H. Turner, S. C. Cowin, J. Y. Rho, R. B. Ashman, and J. C. Rice, "The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone", J. Biomech. 23, pp. 549-561, 1990. |
7. | L. A. Feldkamp, S. A. Goldstein, A. M. Parfitt, G. Jesion, and M. Kleerekoper, "The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography", J. Bone Min. Res. 4, pp. 3-11, 1989. |
8. | U. Bonse, F. Busch, O. Günnewig, F. Beckmann, R. Pahl, G. Delling, M. Hahn, and W. Graeff, "3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 :m spatial and 10-4 energy resolution", Bone Min. 25, pp. 25-38, 1994. |
9. | P. Rüegsegger, B. Koller, and R. Müller, "A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture", Calcif. Tiss. Int. 58, pp. 24-29, 1996. |
10. | R. Müller and P. Rüegsegger, "Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture", G. Lowet, P. Rüegsegger, H. Weinans, A. Meunier (eds.), Bone Research in Biomechanics, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 61-79, 1997. |
11. | W. E. Lorensen and H. E. Cline, "Marching Cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm", Computer Graphics 21, pp. 163-169, 1987. |
12. | L. J. Gibson, "The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone", J. Biomech. 18, pp. 317-328, 1985. |
13. | K. S. Jensen, Li. Mosekilde, and Le. Mosekilde, "A model of vertebral trabecular bone architecture and its mechanical properties", Bone 11, pp. 417-423, 1990. |
14. | R. Müller, and P. Rüegsegger, "Three-dimensional finite element modelling of non-invasively assessed trabecular bone structures", J. Med. Eng. Phys. 17, pp. 126-133, 1995. |
15. | G. Krabbel, and R. Müller, "Development of a finite element model of the head using the visible human data", Abstracts of the Visible Human Project Conference, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA, October 7-8, pp. 71-72, 1996. |
16. | R. W. Goulet, S. A. Goldstein, M. J. Ciarelli, J. L. Kuhn, M. B. Brown, and L. A. Feldkamp, "The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone", J. Biomech. 27, pp. 375-389, 1994. |
17. | B. Van Rietbergen, H. Weinans, R. Huiskes, and A. Odgaard, "A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models", J. Biomech. 28, pp. 69-81, 1995. |
18. | R. Müller and P. Rüegsegger, "Analysis of mechanical properties of cancellous bone under conditions of simulated bone atrophy", J. Biomech. 29, pp. 1053-1060, 1996. |
19. | B. Van Rietbergen, R. Müller, D. Ulrich, P. Rüegsegger and R. Huiskes, "Tissue stresses and strain in trabeculae of canine proximal femur can be quantified from com-puter reconstructions", J. Biomech. 32, pp. 165-174, 1999. |
20. | D. Ulrich, A. Laib, T. Hildebrand and P. Rüegsegger, "Mechanical competence of the distal radius", Osteoporosis Int. 7, p. 268, 1997.. |
21. | J. Wolff, Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, Hirschwald, Berlin, 1892. |
22. | R. Müller, and W. C. Hayes, "Biomechanical competence of microstructural bone in the progress of adaptive bone remodeling", U. Bonse (ed.), Developments in X-Ray Tomography, SPIE Vol. 3149, pp. 69-81, 1997. |
23. | R. Müller, and J. Barragan, "Long-term prediction of bone architecture and bone strength in simulations of pre-, peri- and post-menopausal microstructural bone loss and antiresorptive treatment", Abstracts 21st Annual Meeting ASBMR, St. Louis, USA, J. Bone Miner. Res., 1999. |
TOP OF PAGE | HOJ HOME |
HOJ HOME | Chiefs Reports | Osgood Day | Scientific Articles | Alumni Association |