Bisphosphonates Increase Periprosthetic Bone Stock
Fabian von Knoch1, Myung-Rae Cho2, Grant Garrigues, Claude Alabre3, Harry Rubash, Arun Shanbhag
Biomaterials Research Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Introduction
Periprosthetic particle-induced osteolysis with subsequent aseptic loosening remains the most common long-term complication associated with total joint replacements.1-3 Wear debris including ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particles from the articulating surfaces activate phagocytic cells at the bone-implant interface, subsequently initiating an osteolytic cascade involving peri-prosthetic granulomatous inflammation and bone resorption.4-6 We have previously demonstrated that bisphosphonates, which inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption are effective in preventing wear debris-induced bone loss.7 In the same model we reported that bisphosphonate treatment enhances net bone in implant porosities.8 These observations are supported by in-vitro studies demonstrating that bisphosphonates promote osteoblastic bone formation by enhancing osteoblast recruitment from human bone marrow stromal cells,9 stimulating osteoblast proliferation and maturation10-11 and inhibiting their apoptosis.12 These findings suggest that bisphosphonate treatment after joint replacements may result in a net gain of bone mass, and potentially an improved fixation of orthopaedic implants. To test if this was indeed the case, we investigated the effects of two FDA approved bisphosphonates: alendronate and zoledronate, on periprosthetic bone stock in a rabbit model of a porous coated implant. Alendronate is clinically used in treating post-menopausal osteoporosis and zoledronate is markedly effective in preventing hypercalcemia due to cancer.13-14
Experimental Model
Following Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, a fiber-mesh coated titanium plug (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN; 4 mm in diameter and 25 mm in length) was implanted in the intramedullary notch in both femoral condyles of 36 skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits (3.5 4.0 kgs). Implants were sterilized by gamma radiation by the manufacturer before delivery. On the left femurs only, the implants were coated with submicron UHMWPE particles (about 200 x 106 particles per implant) fabricated in the laboratory using a cryogenic attrition technique.15 This UHMWPE wear debris ranging from 0.2 - 10 µm (mean 2.3 ± 0.5 µm) is clinically similar to that found around failed joint replacements,16 and initiated osteolysis in a canine model.7 Rabbits were randomized to three groups (control, alendronate, zoledronate). Control animals received no further treatment after surgery. Animals in the alendronate group were administered weekly subcutaneous injections of alendronate (3.0 mg/week, Fosamax, Merck, Rahway, NJ), starting intra-operatively day 0 and continued weekly thereafter until sacrifice. Animals in the zoledronate group received a single intravenous injection of zoledronate (Zometa, Novartis, East Hanover, NJ) intraoperatively at a dose of 0.015 mg/kg. Six/twelve rabbits from each group were sacrificed 6 weeks post-operative and the remaining six/twelve rabbits were sacrificed at 12 weeks.
Analytical Methods
Radiographic Analysis
Bilateral contact radiographs (anteroposterior and lateral view) were performed on all rabbits after sacrifice, and evaluated qualitatively for evidence of peri-implant bone apposition and resorption. Anterioposterior radiographs were digitized and the lateral and medial cortical thickness was measured on 7 horizontal planes, spaced 2 mm apart, proximally and distally from the proximal end of the implant.
Bone Histomorphometry
At harvest, 36 samples from 18 rabbits (3 per group) were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and prepared utilizing hard tissue processing. Serial transverse sections were prepared from the proximal, middle and distal regions of the implant and stained with toluidine blue for static histomorphometry or left unstained for dynamic histomorphometry. Bone histomorphometry was performed using OsteoMeasureTM (Version 4.0) software and camera Lucida through a Nikon Eclipse E400 microscope. Bone volume density (BV/TV) and osteoid thickness (O.Th) were measured between the endosteal cortical and implant surfaces and expressed in accordance with the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) nomenclature17.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA and post-hoc paired, two-sided T-tests. All p-values were compared to an a-value of 0.05 to determine significance.
Results
Radiographically, both bisphosphonate treatments resulted in more radiodense femoral condyles and a pronounced increase in periprosthetic bone apposition (Fig. 1). While the UHMWPE particle burden in group I resulted in localized scalloping and radiolucency characteristics of osteolysis, increased periprosthetic bone stock was found in both bisphosphonate treated groups with particle burden. Periprosthetic cortical thickness showed consistently higher values for groups II and III compared to group I both at 6 and 12 weeks (Fig. 2). After bisphosphonate treatment, the cortical thickness increased up to 18 % at 6 weeks (p<0.001) and up to 19 % at 12 weeks (p="0.0013).</p">
Histomorphometric analyses confirmed the anabolic effects of bisphosphonates on periprosthetic bone turnover (see Table 1), particularly in the presence of UHMWPE wear particles. Following a 6-week treatment with either bisphosphonate, peri-implant bone volume density (BV/TV) doubled in femurs without added wear debris and increased more than 3-fold in the presence of wear debris. Osteoid thickness too, more than doubled after treatment with alendronate (p=0.007) or zoledronate (p=0.051). These effects were less pronounced after 12 weeks than at 6 weeks suggesting that bisphosphonates to accelerate the initial stage of periprosthetic bone healing, which would be particularly important in promoting implant osteointegration.
Discussion
In this study we provide evidence that clinically used bisphosphonates, alendronate and zoledronate have anabolic effects on periprosthetic bone turnover stock in vivo with and without the presence of UHMWPE wear debris. Our data suggest that bisphosphonates are capable of both inhibiting particle-induced osteoclastic bone resorption as well as stimulating osteoblastic bone formation, resulting in a net gain of peri-implant cortical and cancellous bone. One of the most striking findings of our study was a significant thickening of peri-implant cortical bone by up to 20% after 6 and 12 weeks of bisphosphonate treatment. This is particularly noteworthy since zoledronate was given as a single dose at the time of surgery. Bisphosphonate therapy induced similarly potent anabolic effects on cancellous bone turnover. Cancellous bone volume density and new bone forming activity around the implants were found to be up to 3-fold increased compared to control animals. Consistent with these findings, recent human clinical trials showed that bisphosphonates reduce periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.18-20 Our findings suggest that the effects of bisphosphonates on periprosthetic bone turnover with a net gain of cortical and cancellous bone are at least partially due to a direct stimulation of osteoblastic bone formation. Our recent in vitro studies9,10 suggest that bisphosphonates might promote gene expression of key osteogenic transcription factors including BMP-2 and core binding factor alpha subunit 1 (cbfa-1) acting as successive differentiation triggers, which secondarily result in a pronounced recruitment, proliferation and anabolic activation of osteoblasts. Interestingly, in the present study, bisphosphonate treatment resulted in more pronounced bone formation associated with concurrent UHWMPE wear debris addition compared to conditions without added wear particles. These new findings suggest that bisphosphonate treatment may even overcompensate for the established negative effects of wear debris on osteoblastic function around implants in vivo.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH AR 47465-02), Merck Inc. and Zimmer Co.
Notes:
1currently at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Chur, Switzerland
2currently at Koisin University Gospel Hospital, Pusan, South Korea
3currently a medical student at Boston University, Boston, MA
Address correspondence to: Arun Shanbhag, PhD, MBA Biomaterials Lab, GRJ 1115, 55 Fruit Street Boston, MA 02114 Tel: (617) 724-1923 shanbhag@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
References:
- Friedman RJ, Black J, Galante JO, Jacobs JJ, Skinner H. Current Concepts in Orthopaedic Biomaterials and Implant Fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A:1086-1109.
- Jacobs JJ, Shanbhag AS, Glant TT, Black J, Galante JO. Wear debris in total joint replacements. J Amer Acad Orthop Surg 1994;2:212-220.
- Sinha RK, Shanbhag AS, Maloney WJ, Hasselman CT, Rubash HE. Osteolysis: cause and effect. Instr Course Lect 1998; 47:307-320.
- Willert HG, Semlitsch M. Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1977; 11:157-164.
- Goldring SR, Schiller AL, Roelke M, Rourke CM, ONeill DA, Harris WH. The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65A:575-584.
- Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Human monocyte response to particulate biomaterials generated in vivo and in vitro. J Orthop Res 1995;13:792-801.
- Shanbhag AS, Hasselman CT, Rubash HE. The John Charnley Award. Inhibition of wear debris mediated osteolysis in a canine total hip arthroplasty model. Clin Orthop 1997; 344:33-43.
- Shanbhag AS, May D, Cha C, Hasselman CT, Rubash HE. Enhancing net bone formation in canine total hip components with bisphosphonates. Trans OR 2002; 44:255.
- von Knoch F, Jaquiery C, Kowalsky M, Schaeren S, Alabre C, Martin I, Rubash HE, Shanbhag AS. Effects of bisphosphonates on proliferation and osteoblast differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials In Press 2005.
- Im GI, Qureshi SA, Kenney J, Rubash HE, Shanbhag AS. Osteoblast proliferation and maturation by bisphosphonates. Biomaterials 2004; 25:4105-4115.
- Reinholz GG, Getz B, Pederson L, Sanders ES, Subramaniam M, Ingle JN, Spelsberg TC. Bisphosphonates directly regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression in human osteoblasts. Cancer Res 2000; 60:6001-7.
- Plotkin LI, Weinstein RS, Parfitt AM, Roberson PK, Manolagas SC, Bellido T. Prevention of osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis by bisphosphonates and calcitonin. J Clin Invest 1999; 104:1363-1374.
- Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JO, Tucci JR, Emkey RD, Tonino RP, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Downs RW, Gupta J, Santora AC, Liberman U. Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. Ten years experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1189-1199.
- Wellington K, Goa KL. Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in the management of bone metastases and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Drugs 2003;63:417-437.
- Shanbhag AS, Hasselman CT, Rubash HE. Technique for generating submicrometer ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Orthop Res 1996; 14:1000- 1004.
- Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Macrophage/particle interactions: effect of size, composition and surface area. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28:81- 90.
- Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2:595-610.
- Soininvaara TA, Jurvelin JS, Miettinen HJ, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM, Kroger PJ. Effect of alendronate on periprosthetic bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: a one-year, randomized, controlled trial of 19 patients. Calcif Tissue Int 2002;71:472-477.
- Venesmaa PK, Kroger HP, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhav EM. Alendronate reduces periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:2126-2133.
- Wang CJ, Wang JW, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Huang CC, Chen HS. The effect of alendronate on bone mineral density in the distal part of the femur and proximal part of the tibia after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2003;85A:2121-2126.
|